A Stranger Is Watching Essay - 554 Words

A Stranger is Watching A Stranger is Watching is a terrific book. I enjoyed reading this book very much. The non-stop action kept me reading for hours. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;One of the best features of the book is how it was written. The point of view changes every chapter. For example Chapter 1 is written in the point of view of the infamous Foxy character. Chapter 2 is written in the point if view of our protagonist, Steve; and so on .I also liked how the author built the relationship of the characters up, so you care about what happens to them and feel like youre going through what they are going through. For instance, the author tells us of Steves wifes death. We find out that Steves son,†¦show more content†¦Throughout the story we find out that the antagonist is very jealous of the protagonists life and thats why he indirectly targets him. This contrast was an addition to the already exciting plot of the story.. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In my opinion the best part of quot;A Stranger is Watchingquot;is the end, chapter 52.this chapter contains one of the greatest climaxes I ever read. The chapter begins at a frantic moment. All of the characters lives are at risk because Foxys bomb is about to go off. After a fight with Foxy, Steve manages to release Sharon and Neil. At the same time Ronald Thompson(a juvenile convicted if murder)is about to be executed for the murder of Steves wife, Nina. A few chapters earlier we find out that Nina is Foxys victim but he got off clean with it. Steve races out of Grand Central Station (where the bomb is going to go off)with Sharon and Neil. At this point the author stops her narrative and begins with the time eleven forty-two, twelve minutes after the bomb goes off, at this point we dont know what happened to our characters. In this next paragraph we are informed that Steve, Neil ,and Sharon get away while Foxy dies from his own bomb. We also find out that R onald Thompson is saved from his execution and released from prison. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;I enjoyed this part of the story so much because it was the point of the highest excitement. Every event that took place in the story built up to this major event. AllShow MoreRelated A Stranger is Watching Essay609 Words   |  3 PagesA Stranger is Watching In novels there are many literary devices that an author may use. Suspense is one that is used to grab the reader’s attention and keep reading. Mary Higgins Clark demonstrates suspense throughout her novel, A Stranger Is Watching by giving only so much information then she will direct your attention to something else so the reader keeps reading. Some suspenseful scenes that the author demonstrates in the novel are when an intruder is in the Peterson home and isRead MoreThe Performance Of The Nielson Company1552 Words   |  7 Pagesconstantly brought in large revenues for the producers and theaters. However, with the growing availability of online streaming people now have the ability to access movies in the comfort of their own homes, which brings about the debate of whether watching a movie at home or in a theater creates the most enjoyable experience. The Nielson Company is a business that produces television program ratings and as of 2011, the company reported that 96.7% of American households own at least one televisionRead MoreThe Video That I Have Chosen From Www1042 Words   |  5 Pages The video that I have chosen from www.ted.com is called, â€Å"Why You Should Talk to Strangers,† by Kio Stark. I chose this video because the title really had me wondering what her answer would be and what justification she had behind it. The big picture behind her speech was to acknowledge people when you see them. We walk around the University of Louisville’s campus all the time, seeing people we don’t know and never speak to them. This video really influenced me to want to talk to the people I passRead MoreSocial Order And Its Effect On Society1386 Words   |  6 Pagestaken-for-granted in society. The social order my helper and I breached was walking patterns. For instance, strangers do not walk together in any t ype of environment or situation unless forced. If people are traveling at the same speed, people will walk in staggered formation. The only time this does not happen is when a place is too crowded and there is no way to avoid it. If a person ends up walking next to a stranger it usually indicates that he or she wishes to pass them. In this case, the person being passedRead MoreFilm Viewing Experience : Online Vs.984 Words   |  4 Pageswants with just one click, so why do people still prefer to attend cinema rather than enjoy films at home? Why is it so exciting sitting in darkness at the exact time and  take pleasure in watching film with total strangers? In order to answer these questions one should contrast experience received from watching film at cinema and those viewed online. Thus, to investigate it thoroughly I went to my local cinema and watched stunning  biographical  adventure  film In the Heart of the Sea (2015) directedRead MoreCompare and Contrast Watching a Movie at Home vs. Going to the Theatre1011 Words   |  5 PagesBusi 9/9/11 CHOOSING TO WATCH A MOVIE AT HOME OR IN THEATRES. Watching a film on TV is better than watching in theaters this how I’m going to prove my comparisons. Its annoying when you hear from friends what happens in the movie and it ruins the whole thing. It just isnt the same! It depends on, how good your surround system is and how big your TV is, and economic hardships today. It does not mean that the enjoyment of watching movies needs to be sacrificed. There is something to be said forRead MoreEssay about Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?1264 Words   |  6 Pagesdealing with people whom she has never met and if gone out of hands, controlling the situation using intelligent methods. Even though Connie a normal teenager, who loved her friends, went to school, and enjoyed life, she was mercilessly harassed by a stranger to an extent that could have been avoided. Initially, Connie had a normal childhood. She visited her friends who were just like her in many ways. Her best friend’s father used to drop them all to the mall as it was not safe if theyRead MoreA Stranger Among Us648 Words   |  3 PagesA Stranger Among Us A Stranger Among Us is a movie that displays many aspects of ethnicity, and how many different groups of people interact and adapt to each other’s difference. There is a murder and a detective named Emily Eden has to place herself into a Jewish community to help solve this murder. In the film there is several groups displayed and many different perspectives, along with an ethnic neighborhood and lots of learning about the Hasidic culture, and Detective Eden made some crucialRead MoreHome Television vs. Theater Movies1100 Words   |  4 PagesIn todays technologically advanced world, there has never been a better time to be entertained. There are literally thousands of choices, including going out, staying in, watching movies, television, or DVDs. There have been many debates regarding which of these entertainment forms are the best option. This debate has focused specifically on whether it is better to be entertained by the movie industry in the comfort of ones home or in th e luxury of a theater. While there are specific advantagesRead MoreAnalysis : Veronica Mars 1609 Words   |  7 Pagesticking in her head that counted the seconds she’d been seated at Dominick’s. Her table was a strategic choice; far from, but angled towards, the door- a perfect position to watch for any man that had the slightest potential to be CA152. Talking to a stranger and daring to meet the man and be nervous about it, there was some silliness in that. Waiting at a table alone, with a rose as identification felt completely silly to Veronica. Wait a minute, was that†¦ Veronica’s watchful eyes caught a glimpse of

The Cia And The John F Kennedy Assassination - 2436 Words

The CIA and the John F Kennedy Assassination The day November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, would soon become known as a tragic day in US history. John F Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States, had been drumming up support for the upcoming election. Tragically, he was brutally gunned down by Lee Harvey Oswald. At first glance, this assassination seems like a simple murder. A communist defector simply was angry with JFK and decided to kill him. Many people have failed to notice, however, that the CIA not only had motive to kill JFK, but they also attempted to cover up many details about Lee Harvey Oswald, and JFK in general. If the general populus continues to believe what the CIA wants them to, we will never understand who†¦show more content†¦As a result of this and other factors, the House Select Committee on Assassinations(HSCA for short) launched an investigation of both the Warren Report and the assassination itself. Much more evidence was uncovered in this inve stigation, prompting the members to come to the conclusion that JFK’s murder was due to conspiracy; however, this still dissatisfied many Americans, as the report failed to mention who was in conspiracy with Oswald. Throughout this period, many conspiracy theories have been born as to who killed JFK. Due to secret Cuban operations, the CIA had both a motive and means to kill John F Kennedy. Throughout most of JFK’s presidency, he was highly critical of the CIA; however, it was not always this way. JFK had been in support of CIA operations in Cuba until, according to MaryFerrell.org, â€Å"This changed with the ill-fated Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, inherited from the Eisenhower administration. Kennedy accepted responsibility publicly, but privately blamed the CIA and obtained the resignation of longtime Director Allen Dulles and others. He also implemented NSAM 55, transferring control of paramilitary operations to the Defense Dept†(MaryFerrell.org). This was not only the start of poor relations between JFK and the CIA, but triggered many CIA personnel to blame JFK privately for their failure. Leaving many CIA officers very

Realism in Eudora Weltys A Worn Path Essay - 1229 Words

Realism in Eudora Weltys A Worn Path Eudora Weltys A Worn Path is a story that emphasizes the natural symbolism of the surroundings. The main character in the story, Phoenix Jackson, is an old black woman who seeks out to find medicine for her sick nephew. This story contains a motif, which is the continuous walking of Phoenix Jackson throughout her journey. She lives in the pinewoods and faces the challenging experience of walking through the snowy, frozen earth to get to the hospital in the city of Natchez. Phoenix Jackson is a very caring person, and is in love with life. Although she is very old, it seems that she has many years ahead of her. Eudora Welty brings realism into the story describing the realities of being†¦show more content†¦The copper smell of her hair brings more realism of old age. When she stops to sit down under a tree, she dazes off and thinks that a little boy is giving her a piece of marble cake. She then snaps out of her trance and sees only her hand waiving in the air. This shows that very old people hallucinate sometimes, which is completely natural. The name Phoenix, is the name of an ancient Egyptian bird that regenerates itself after 500 years and lives on for another 500 years. This old woman represents the phoenix, which lives on in her old age. Phoenix Jackson demonstrates her love of life as she talks to all of the animals within the forest: Out of my way, all you foxes, owls, beetles, jack rabbits, coons and wild animal! Keep out from under these feet, little bob-whites. Keep the big wild hogs out of my path. Dont let none of those come running my direction. I got a long way (87). She realizes she has a long journey ahead of her, but will do whatever it takes to help her nephew. Phoenix Jackson seems to be one with nature and brings peace and harmony to everything living in the forest. However, the forest has the aura of death. For instance, Phoenix spots a buzzard sitting upon an old, dead tree that resembled a black man. The buzzard represents death, but the old women made her way through the furrow andShow MoreRelatedLiterary Analysis Of A Worn Path1221 Words   |  5 PagesOvercoming Obstacles: A Literary Analysis of â€Å"A Worn Path† Thesis: â€Å"A Worn Path† by Eudora Welty is one of the best short stories to incorporate different symbolic representations of determination and the will to live. I. Introduction II. Phoenix A. Definition B. Characteristics III. Natural symbolism A. Steep hill B. Thorns of bush IV. Perceived Racism A. Imagined cake B. White hunter V. Arrival in Natchez A. Nurses’ comments BRead More The Hero Sojourner In A Worn Path by Eudora Welty Essay883 Words   |  4 PagesThe Hero Sojourner in A Worn Path by Eudora Welty In A Worn Path by: Eudora Welty, the main character emulates the necessary nuts and bolts of the archetypal journey as its hero; answers a call to an adventure, has to go through trials of fear, and ending with the retrieval of two prizes. Eudora Weltys short story A Worn Path takes place on a bright, frozen day in December. Representing a struggle, but most of all represents determination. Her name is Phoenix Jackson. This story is about sacrificeRead More Eudora Weltys A Worn Path Essay1363 Words   |  6 PagesEudora Weltys A Worn Path Eudora Weltys A Worn Path is a story that emphasizes the natural symbolism of the surroundings. As the story begins, we are introduced to our main character, Phoenix Jackson; she is described as a small, old Negro woman. I believe that the name Eudora Welty gives our main character is very symbolic. The legend of the Phoenix is about a fabled sacred bird of ancient Egyptians. The bird is said to come out of Arabia every 500 years to Heliopolis, where it burnedRead MoreThe Journey: Symbolism of â€Å"a Worn Path† and â€Å"the Road Not Taken† Final2218 Words   |  9 PagesThe Journey: Symbolism of â€Å"A Worn Path† and â€Å"The Road Not Taken† Expedition. Voyage. Excursion. Pilgrimage. There are many words that are used to describe the word journey but what does it really mean? Many people consider the word journey as merely a distance in which they have traveled or will eventually travel; often they fail to recognize that there can be great meaning beyond each step that is taken. Too often, people become more focused on the destination rather than the process

Guns Are A Controversial Topic - 1397 Words

Guns are a very controversial topic for almost all people. There is a good amount of people who are progun, for reasons such as self-defense, hunting, and so on. There is also a good amount of people who are antigun, for reasons such as they kill people, they are dangerous, and so on. The people who own them, view guns as tools or toys, vs. the people who are scared of them, view them as killing machines. There are many different views, thoughts, and opinions on guns, but there is only one that is right. In â€Å"Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns† by Molly Ivins, the author is antigun. She claims to be proknife, which is very interesting seeing as a good portion of the reason why people are antigun is because guns kill people and you†¦show more content†¦t This making her point here not make sense, because if the point was to cause less murders and attacks it would not be very effective. It would be a better, more effective, idea for her to have been anti gu n and anit knife, so basically anit weapon. Molly Ivins claims to take what the second amendment says literally, but she does not do this very well. The second amendment says, â€Å"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed†(qtd in Ivins323). Notice it says nothing about the people who own guns having to be part of the well-regulated militia, which she claims here, â€Å"It says quite clearly that guns are for those who form part of a well-regulated militia, that is, the armed force, including the National Guard.†(Ivins324). The amendment truly just says that in order to have a militia people must have the right to own guns, which is something the author does not include in her interpretation. Where she was going with her interpretation can be seen and it does make sense in a way, but in the end it just seems like she made it so it fit here viewpoint. Ivins also say, â€Å"Fourteen-year-old boys are not part of a well-regulated militia.†(Ivins323). This should not even be included, because of the fact that fourteen-year-old boys cannot even legally own guns. This means that they would have gotten them illegaly, so if

Yes Men Fix the World, Ethics of Protest and Bringing Issues to Light Free Essays

AG401 Film Yes Men Fix the World, the Ethics of Protest and Bringing Issues to Light 1. What ethical/moral/philosophical constructs are the activists operating under with respect to their tactics in protest? The Yes Men use Utilitarian Ethics of Duty and Rule Consequentialism. With this mindset, they carry on pranks and hoaxes to reveal the lies of large corporations and government. We will write a custom essay sample on Yes Men Fix the World, Ethics of Protest and Bringing Issues to Light or any similar topic only for you Order Now In the theory of Duty-Based Ethics, people do the right thing because it is the right thing to do. These large corporate giants do nothing but take the toll on others’ misfortunes. An example of Duty-Ethics can be seen when Andy impersonates Jude Finisterra, a spokesperson for Dow Chemicals, being interviewed on BBC regarding the Bhopal Legacy catastrophe of Union Carbide and its deadly gas leaks in India. He is quoted saying, â€Å"this is the first time in history that a publicly owned company, of anything near the size of Dow, has performed an action which is significantly against its bottom line, simply because it’s the right thing to do. † In theory of Rule Consequentialism, it states that an action is morally right just because it is required by an optimific social rule; relating back to Duty Ethics. With the motive under Rule Consequence, the Yes Men planned to set a course of actions which might trigger a reaction so that corporate giants and government may conform to such a social rule. As long as the outcome is of a happy ending for the public, Mike and Andy will have succeeded to change and affect society in ways that money could not. To correct an action which harms society more than benefits it, sometimes ridiculing and exposing the negative aspects of it might be the only course for corrective action. 2. Do the tactics distract from the message or lend power to the message? On what ethical grounds? In theory, such pranks and hoaxes are supposed to create change as a result from negative publicity. This derives from Kantian Ethics, which actually goes against Consequentalism, kind of an oxy-moron. Although it is morally just, their actions do have negative consequences to certain parties. As far as exposure goes, their tactics seemed have to work in their favor, and the Yes Men have also defied legal repercussions in every scenario. And by bringing such important public issues into light, some objectives were achieved; transmitting the power of voice towards the public, and conveying the theory of moral duty to the companies. However, their main purpose was not accomplished, and their tactics seem to have failed again; in fact nothing significant was taken into consideration or changed by any of the targeted corporations, or even the government entities. For example, in the Catastrophic Loss Conference, Andy and Mike pose as representatives from Halliburton; which they have claimed was the top company in extracting profits from a disaster. Halliburton has made hundreds of millions of dollars off the Hurricane Katrina disaster, and now the Yes Men have arrived to presenting another invention called the SurvivaBall; again to â€Å"profit† off some disaster. Their tactic was to create the â€Å"biggest joke ever by making fun of stupid concepts with stupid ideas. † And with something as simple as the SurvivaBall being so useless, it relates to the concept of Big Corporate making money off others’ misfortunes instead of solving the problems which lay before them; the ironic part is that the SurvivaBall is actually more useful than what the government or companies like Halliburton have created for disasters. But to their shock when all was presented, their attempts of letting people know what â€Å"sucked about letting greed run our future,† was instead greeted with business cards. . What about the ethics of law enforcement in dealing with activists? If anything was taken from this documentary, it was that companies cannot learn to behave differently by themselves; government has to make rules to control them. To fix the world, it is going to take more than two guys, cheap suits, and fake websites; it would take millio ns of people. When activists begin threatening for change, law enforcement entities may only deal on legal premises; as there is a right to freedom of speech and to assemble and petition the government. If no harm and damage or rioting is caused, law enforcement may only be there to prevent incidents. An example may be observed with over two dozen people wearing SurvivaBall costumes demonstrating in the East River; where police shut down the demonstration for lack of a permit. Andy Bichlbaum was arrested on an outstanding parking ticket charge and a handful of others were served with summons and tickets for disorderly behavior and creating hazardous conditions. So they also tried this, attempting to cost HUD more money and put some out of jobs. They hope to expose to the public by making a mockery of an entity in able to stimulate a solution or action. But it never works. Mike Bonanno Andy Bichlbaum Duty-Based Ethics Jude Finisterra, faking as a spokesperson for Dow Chemicals regarding the Bhopal Legacy catastrophe of Union Barpide and its deadly gas leaks in India, quoted saying that â€Å"this is the first time in history that a publicly owned company, of anything near the size of Dow, has performed an action which is significantly against its bottom line, simply because it’s the right thing to do. However it was hilarious that he noted they were going to liquidate $12 billion in assets to provide care and compensation to the victims and their families. Halliburton #1 company in extracting profits from a disaster. Made Hundreds of millions off Katrina, and now (name) and (name) are presenting the Survivor Ball, to â€Å"profit† off a disaster. Biggest joke ever, of how to make fun of stupid ideas, well, wit h stupid ideas. For example, something so simple of a Survivor Ball is useless, also like the concept of making money off others’ misfortune instead of solving the problem. But the ironic part of this is that the survivor ball is actually more useful than what the government or companies like Halliburton have created solutions for disasters. But what their attempts of letting people know what sucked about letting greed run our future, but instead of freaking out, they just took their business cards. Companies cannot learn to behave differently by themselves, government has to make rules to control them. So they also tried this, attempting to cost HUD more money and put some out of jobs. How to cite Yes Men Fix the World, Ethics of Protest and Bringing Issues to Light, Essay examples

Describe the main differences betwen the Yalta and Potsdam free essay sample

The Big Three, as they were known, met in February 1945 at Yalta, Crimea, USSR, and then again In July at Potsdam, Germany. These conferences, the Yalta Conference and the Potsdam conference respectively, were meant to decide the future of the world after the wardecisions made by the three most powerful men In the world at the time, from the three most powerful nations. While both conferences were meant to attempt a smooth transition into post-war life, the two summits still differed greatly, even though they were intended to accomplish the same things.The main differences between the Yalta Conference and the Potsdam conference were the changes In the Big Three between the conferences, alterations In the aims of the traders, and a general heightening of tensions between the three nations. The difference in the leaders involved in the two conferences was a major factor in the differentiation between Yalta and Potsdam. We will write a custom essay sample on Describe the main differences betwen the Yalta and Potsdam or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page At Yalta, the Big Three was composed of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, U. S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin. At Potsdam, Attlee replaced Churchill after his defeat In the British elections, and Truman took Roosevelt position. The only constant figure In the conferences was Stalin, the leader of one of the most introversion nations in the world. As previously mentioned, the only issue the three countries truly saw eye-to-eye on was eradicating the Nazi presence from the world. Two capitalist nations allied with a vehemently communist one already poses some problems with communications, and the change from Roosevelt to Truman between the conferences only added to the discrepancies between Yalta and Potsdam.Truman stated of his ally Stalin that he was tired of babying the Soviets. Roosevelt, a much more diplomatic figure, was one of the key factors In the disparity teens Yalta and Potsdam. While he also had doubts about Russia, Roosevelt kept these feelings between himself and Churchill, without truly laying them out in the open. Truman openly stated that he was going to get tough with the Russians, and so contributed to the difference In policies that the US had regarding the Russians at Potsdam.The change In the Big Three at Yalta and Potsdam was a large part In the disparities In the two conferences. Other contributing issues in the difference between Yalta and Potsdam concerned he objectives of the Big Three at Yalta and the disagreements over them at Potsdam. At Yalta, Germany and Japan were both undefeated at the time, yet plans were being made as to Germanys division after its predicted loss. The Big Three Intended to divide up Germany Into French, British, Russian, and American sections.Russia also the war, totaling at about 20 million deaths and the destruction of over 1000 towns. Stalin wanted harsh payment from the Germans, involving the confiscation of about 80% of its industry, allied control of the economy, and annual reparations payments dad to the allies. These numbers are vital to later understanding the mentality of the Russians by the time of the so-called Long Telegram. To look into the matter, a reparations commission was set up.Furthermore, in exchange for Soviet control of Poland (reorganizing the government to be made democratic), the Russians agreed to facilitate the formation of democratic states in Eastern Europe that would be freed from German control. Lastly, it was agreed upon that once Germany was defeated, Russia would formally enter the war against Japan to aid in its defeat. At Potsdam, forever, these aims and objectives were forced into close scrutiny by the Big Three, and major disagreements between the three leaders occurred.By this time, Germany had been defeated, although the US was still at war with Japan. Regarding Germany, which was agreed upon at Yalta to be split into four zones, the Big Three faced open contention over the boundaries of the four sections. Germany was also forced to pay reparations to Russia, and was forced to give up 10% of its industry. However, Britain and the US felt that it was too much and that milking Germany of all its assets would eave its people poor and starving.Other disagreements that arose involved the Eastern European democratic states that were supposed to be established by Russia; Britain and the US claimed that communism was manifesting itself in those states with the aid of the Soviets, rather than the intended democracies. Lastly, Truman and Attlee had doubts in the Soviet control of Poland, after Stalin arrested all non- communists in the Polish state. Stalin wanted Attlee and Truman to recognize his authority over these puppet states, which they refused to do. The main difference teens Yalta and Potsdam was the level of consensus reached in each of the conferences.The objectives were mapped out at Yalta, and then disputed over at Potsdam. Although they apparently remained the same on paper, there was much disagreement over the application of the aims, which then translated into the major difference between the two conferences. Another main difference between the Yalta Conference and the Potsdam Conference was the level of tensions between the Big Three. At Yalta, while there were still tensions present, most of it was hidden behind the scenes; at Potsdam, open agreement was the case.When Churchill was part of the Big Three, he wrote to Roosevelt during Yalta The Soviet Union has become a danger to the free world. However, at Potsdam, there were open accusations regarding Russians approach to communism and their attempt at transforming the rest of Europe into a communist society. The changes in their objectives also inflamed tensions, with the disagreements over Germanys new borders, Soviet entitlement to reparations, and Russian power over Eastern Europe heightening the power struggles between the Big Three.Truman w as also obviously angered by Stalins move to arrest all of Pollards non-communist leaders. Additionally, at Yalta, Russia had agreed to aid the US in their war against Japan; however, by Potsdam, Truman had had news of the atomic bomb testing and avoided notifying Stalin. Stalin was furious when he discovered Stalin in the dark. Tensions also increased when the US and Britain demanded free elections be held in Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria, whereas Stalin insisted that they would remain under his control. In general, one of the main differences between theYalta Conference and Potsdam was the increase in strained relations between the Big Three. Yalta and Potsdam were the two major peace conferences in World War II. They were both intended to achieve a state of post-war peace, and yet somehow metamorphosed into the arising of further global discord. Even though issues at both conferences were the same, the conferences were not. The major differences between Yalta and Potsdam were the changes in the leaders involved, a shift in the objectives and aims of the conferences, and a great heightening of tensions between he Big Three.